“Banks have responded to this new paradigm, digitising their processes by leveraging and making decisions based on data and analytics, and shifting their focus on consumer experiences that go beyond mobile and online”, says Rosanna Woods, UK Managing Director at Drooms. “They have realised that to remain competitive and maintain market share they need to be more strategic and technologically adept, recognising the need to invest in automation, core modernisation and digitisation.” Below, Rosanna tells us why a collaborative approach is the way forward.
The changing landscape of investment banking
2019 is proving to be a momentous year for the global investment banking industry as it returns to normalcy in terms of profitability and capital adequacy. Global M&A activities, mainly by large US banks, are creating opportunities to expand overseas and acquire FinTech startups.
Today, most investment banks are enthusiastic about digital transformation initiatives to reduce costs and improve customer experience. Although investments banks adhere to their conservative business model, digitisation has shifted power to investors, who favour partnering with banks that are digitally more advanced.
Opportunities amid regulatory challenges
In Europe, the introduction of wide-ranging regulations has also impacted the working environment for banks. For example, the Second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) has encouraged innovation and competition between incumbents and FinTechs, while implementation of the revised General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) framework has given EU citizens comprehensive data protection, forcing banks to ensure the privacy of customers’ data.
While addressing the myriad requirements of these new and contradicting regulations makes data management more daunting for banks, the major challenge for most of them is that data is being managed in siloed and disparate systems, making it all the more difficult to understand clients’ needs and demands.
Today, most investment banks are enthusiastic about digital transformation initiatives to reduce costs and improve customer experience.
However, the good news is that more banks are recognising the capabilities of cognitive technologies in gathering intelligent insights on customers, compliance and operations making collaboration with FinTechs more attractive. Also, robotic process automation (RPA) is rapidly gaining popularity as it brings productivity benefits to the table.
Helpful technology
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been particularly helpful for banks in processes including client servicing, trading, post-trade operations such as reconciliations, transactions reporting, tax operations and enterprise risk management.
While much of the media attention towards AI has focused on its potential capacity to replace humans, at present it is seeing much more practical use in terms of complementing human intelligence. ‘Augmented’ intelligence involves machines assisting humans in their decision-making processes.
A sub-field of AI – Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a good example of augmented intelligence in practice. NLP systems are designed to read and interpret human languages. A key application of this in relation to banking is the analysis of substantial amounts of ‘unstructured data’, which is data that as yet cannot be ‘read’ by machines, such as PDF files, images and audio materials.
Banking is a data-intensive sector and many key tasks demand correct interpretation of partly structured data. Therefore, NLP has the potential to make processes much more efficient with less effort required from humans. As such, FinTechs have been quick to apply this technology because of its value in improving customer interactions, making collaboration with them attractive for most banks.
The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been particularly helpful for banks in processes including client servicing, trading, post-trade operations such as reconciliations, transactions reporting, tax operations and enterprise risk management.
Role in M&A
Technologies such as virtual data rooms (VDRs) come into their own for banks when used in M&A deals, helping to address many of the challenges such pursuits face even at the best of times. There are several key causes of failure, including politics around the deal, culture clashes among the personnel involved and, in particular, parties being unprepared for the due diligence phase. In this latter regard, M&A deals rarely fail because of a lack of knowledge. Rather, it is about how that knowledge is handled. Over half of deals fail because those parties involved are reluctant to confront issues head-on.
Buyers often proceed with deals despite the challenges because they feel obligated by the amounts of time and money involved. They should, however, be prepared to cut their losses if the risks outweigh the benefits. For example, allocating inadequate resources during the review stage cost Bank of America $50 billion in legal fees post its acquisition of Countrywide Financial in 2008, let alone the reputational damage it suffered for inheriting the past mistakes of the mortgage lender.
A VDR enhances the M&A process by increasing the power to collect, process and distribute information to the right parties with much greater security and accuracy. It digitises relevant documents, automates tasks and streamlines workflows.
Authorised users, including those inside a company and their external stakeholders, are connected digitally and in a secure environment with real-time access to all relevant documentation, depending on users’ individual permission levels.
A VDR enhances the M&A process by increasing the power to collect, process and distribute information to the right parties with much greater security and accuracy. It digitises relevant documents, automates tasks and streamlines workflows.
Creating a database in which documents can be updated consistently gives asset owners full control and the ability to react to the latest market conditions, bringing assets to market quickly when the conditions are right, sometimes at short notice.
One of the strengths of the Drooms NXG VDR is its Findings Manager function. This improves the vendor due diligence both prior and during the sales process. It allows for the automatic pre-selection of documents and helps in the assessment of potential risks and opportunities within a transaction. This yields greater control, instils confidence in potential buyers and cuts disruption to existing business.
Blockchain first
Macro forces such as blockchain are also slowly revolutionising many areas of banking. For example, blockchain made it possible to automate approvals of contracts as well as protect the transfer of confidential data from hackers and fraudster whenever transactions are made. In 2018, Drooms became the first provider to move its VDR offering into the blockchain age, using this modern technology to enhance the security of transaction data archives. Up to that point, all data had been stored on physical data carriers following completion of a transaction. But now it can be stored on Drooms’ own servers with blockchain protection. As a result, the secured data cannot be lost, is non-manipulable and is accessible to all parties involved in a transaction at any time.
A new threat
As more financial institutions start to adopt technologies created by FinTechs, a likely threat is emerging. Tech giants such as the likes of Amazon, Alibaba, Apple and Google are attracting customers in the payments domain by offering alternative ways of managing finances. In the US, Amazon is already offering its customers the option to turn spare change into gift cards, and parents can also give children their allowances via a reloadable debit card for example. In India, customers pay delivery fees through a Cashload feature and store excess cash from previous purchases in their account, as well as deposit money for future orders.
With platform companies’ potential to exploit customer data and come up with innovative solutions to address customer pain points, there is a lingering risk of disintermediation for banks. Customers who feel that tech companies alone meet their banking needs may decide to switch to non-banking channels. And there is also the possibility that tech giants may provide banking services in the future, making services provided by banks non-exclusive. Although big techs pre-dominantly target the origination and payments domain of banking, a stronger foothold by platform companies could threaten the survival of many banks in the industry.
Towards modernisation
The various areas of the banking industry will undoubtedly continue to evolve at varying speeds. And as time progresses more banks will likely partner with innovative FinTechs to remain competitive and market relevant. Potential for creative and ground-breaking collaborations and advanced modernisation will also likely increase.
That said, as technology transforms the future of banking, so ought banks’ mindset towards cognitive technologies and collaboration with FinTechs. After all, technology is not a panacea and it is accompanied by many challenges as well as opportunities.
The UK has long been a top destination for investors, having received over £4.5bn of investment into technology companies within the last 3 years. However, with Brexit on the horizon, there is a discussion about how the UK can maintain its attractiveness to foreign and domestic investors after leaving the European Union.
Ana Bencic, Founder and CEO of NextHash, comments on how UK-based, high-growth companies can maintain their appeal to investors in a post-Brexit Britain:
"It is clear that in the UK currently, there is no slowdown in appetite for the investment opportunities that exist, especially in the fast-growing tech sector, but there are questions about whether this will continue after Britain has left the European Union. The UK's abundance of high-growth businesses, particularly those in the technology sector including FinTech, require vital growth finance in the next five years and with the current funding gap, how will these businesses thrive in post-Brexit Britain?
“Blockchain investment platforms can help make global growth finance for scaling technology businesses more transparent and easier to access. Both individual and institutional traders will be able to engage more with blockchain technology-backed trading, where the businesses are backed by a Digital Security Offering and there is greater potential to make rapid returns on their investments than the traditional venture capital route. When this is adopted into the mainstream, it will revolutionise the way businesses will access scale-up finance, how investors will access these companies, and how illiquid shares can be traded into liquid capital in ways never imagined before. As Britain prepares for Brexit, new forms of investment could be crucial for these scaling businesses as well as global investors who want to maintain access to the UK marketplace."
(Source: NextHash)
At stake are our personal data, as well as our monetary possessions. While the concern for the former is a rather new phenomenon, the latter have been guarded by a multi-layered web of intermediaries. And still banks and other financial institutions regularly witness the weaknesses of this set-up. Below Igor Pejic, author of new book ‘Blockchain Babel: The Crypto-Craze and the Challenge to Business’, confronts the question: Is the Blockchain Really Unsinkable?
In recent years a technology hailed for immutability entered the stage: the blockchain. This cryptographically secured, distributed ledger technology was initially designed to bypass the financial system by enabling digital currencies, yet today banks are the most active in blockchain research, trying to reap the benefits of this supposedly tamper-proof ledger. But is the blockchain really unhackable?
In many a head there are probably stories whizzing around about stolen bitcoins and hacked exchanges. Mt. Gox is such a story. In 2014 Mt. Gox was the world’s largest crypto-exchange which processed around 70% of the world’s bitcoin transactions. 850.000 bitcoins were lost (of which around 200.000 were recovered). Further hacks such as the one of the Slovenian exchange Bitstamp followed. Most recently Quadriga, a Canadian exchange, made headlines because its founder Gerald Cotten supposedly passed away on a trip in India. He was the only one to knew the private keys to the wallets of 115,000 customers with funds worth $143m. That funds are thus not accessible and lost.
Yet when commentators use these examples to sow doubt about blockchain-security, they mix up different dimensions of data security, in particular data’s integrity during a transaction with its integrity before or after a transaction. The aforementioned hacks can be attributed to lax security standards aside of transactions such as the storage of private access keys. While parts of the crypto-sphere are reacting – Bitstamp has introduced two-factor authentication to access funds – many wallets and exchanges continue to operate with hair-raising security standards.
But what about the mechanism itself? Can attackers inject bogus transactions or rewrite past ones? This answer depends on the validation mechanism each particular blockchain uses. Let us illustrate this with bitcoin and other chains that work with so-called proof-of-work validation. In this set-up, validator nodes, also known as miners, are investing massive computing power to solve a mathematical puzzle with trial and error mechanisms. They are interested in the “right” solution, because only if they find it first, they are rewarded with freshly minted coins. Once found, the correct value can be verified quickly by the network. The major danger here is that a possible attacker gains control over more than 50% of the hashing power in a network and can vote a wrong truth into reality. The attacker could then submit a transaction to the network, and after getting the good or service he paid for simply use his computing majority to fork the network at a point in time before he sent the money.
Critics will point to the infamous DAO-hack. The DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) was a leaderless organization that issued a token built on Ethereum’s smart contract code. A hacker exploited a cryptographic vulnerability to capture $50m. An ideological conflict of the Ethereum community prevented a soft fork that would have reversed the hack. Thus, a hard fork split the chain into Ethereum (version without the hack) and Ethereum Classic (version including the hack). But even this example was not a hack of the blockchain, but rather a bug that pestered the DAO-code sitting on top of the Ethereum-blockchain. Despite many problematic constellations – e.g. a high concentration of mining pools, as well as a limited number of ISPs hosting large parts of prominent blockchains – the mechanism as such has never been hacked. Attacks are very expensive and the advantages for the most part short-lived.
Does this mean the blockchain is immutable? No. We have to get the fairytale out of our heads that there is something like absolute security. There is always a way to trick the system, even if it is highly unlikely as the aforementioned 51%-attack. The question we should ask instead is whether blockchain is more secure than current systems. What most most critics of new payment technology do not know is that even the SWIFT-network, which enables monetary transactions between 11.000 financial institutions worldwide, has been subject to hacking in the past. In one heist, banks in Bangladesh and Ecuador lost millions. Blockchain technology has proven to be less susceptible to several attack vendors while doing away with intermediaries. This should render the discussion about absolute immutability superfluous.
The card uses a customer’s balance in Bitcoin or any other virtual currency and converts it into pounds or euro when paying in physical stores or online. It is the first crypto-based debit card to link directly with a cryptocurrency exchange in the UK and EU, as previously available crypto cards “required users to pre-load a specified amount of crypto onto their card, adding a point of friction to the process."
Why is the launch of the card important and how will it affect the crypto industry?
Making cryptocurrency usage easier
Along with Coinbase’s Visa card, the crypto exchange is also launching an app which will allow users to choose which cryptocurrency wallets should be connected to their purchases. The app will also allow customers to receive instant receipts, transaction summaries and access to spending categories. The process of converting users’ cryptocurrency into fiat is quite simple – “crypto, equivalent to the amount spent, is liquidated immediately into fiat ensuring the correct value is captured at the time of the transaction. Funds are debited immediately from the customer’s account”, explained Zeeshan Feroz, Coinbase UK CEO.
Rolling out Coinbase’s Visa card means opening up cryptocurrency payments to a large swath of users who are eagerly anticipating mainstream acceptance of cryptocurrency payments for everyday purchases.
The card will be first available in the UK only, with the view to soon be introduced across all European markets in which Coinbase operates. “The UK is a great first market for the Coinbase card with its thriving FinTech ecosystem and consumer willingness to try new ideas. The Coinbase Card will initially be available in the UK with a view to going live, in the coming months”, said Feroz.
What does it mean for the industry?
Rolling out Coinbase’s Visa card means opening up cryptocurrency payments to a large swath of users who are eagerly anticipating mainstream acceptance of cryptocurrency payments for everyday purchases and it goes without saying that any route that allows users to spend crypto in traditional ways is great for the crypto industry. Niv Abramovich, VP of Product at Coti, believes that utilising the card scheme will increase the popularity of cryptocurrencies. “Making digital currencies more accessible to consumers together with the ability to spend cryptocurrency in the real world could be the next phase to mass adoption and mass market of building digital economies and using digital money”.
“Making digital currencies more accessible to consumers together with the ability to spend cryptocurrency in the real world could be the next phase to mass adoption and mass market of building digital economies and using digital money.”
However, Richard Dennis, Founder and Senior Cryptography Adviser at temtum points out that since a Bitcoin transaction takes at least 10 minutes to enter a block, and 60 minutes to be fully confirmed on the blockchain, the payment processes and exchanges involved are risky. “There is a real possibility that a transaction might fail for a number of reasons, and there is nothing that Coinbase would be able to do about it if it does”, he says. So while the new Coinbase card is a significant step forward to using cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange for daily purchases, as was the original vision of Bitcoin, Dennis thinks that the current generation of blockchain architecture is not able to completely remove the risk from the payment providers.
Steven Parker, CEO of Crypterium, on the other hand, admits that the card is a good ‘starting point’, however, he argues that the solution is still quite narrow because it will be only available to customers in the UK. “There’s no doubt that crypto debit cards are one of the easiest ways to bridge the gap between the crypto and traditional economies, enabling holders to spend digital assets with the same ease as fiat currencies. Big players like Coinbase play a vital role in spreading the word about this product, but ultimately, companies with more inclusive propositions will conquer the market”, concludes Parker.
Financial technology is rapidly progressing, so fast that people are forgetting the world economic crisis that happened 10 years ago. With the evolution of financial technology, new services and better options are being created for consumers all over the world. Digital technology has created a much better user experience for users all over the world, and sky’s the limit indeed. This is what you can expect from financial technology five years from now.
It wasn’t too long ago that, for every financial service you needed, a trip to the bank was a given to get that service. With the advent of technology and the age of digitization, those days are no more. You can literally pay every single bill of yours and transfer money to people across the world with a mobile application at your disposal at any time and any place, and the evolution of these services is rapid and continuous. The digitization of financial affairs means a much better user experience, which reflects positively on revenues and sales numbers. People love slacking around and still getting things done, and in the future, there’s no telling how much more comfortable technology will make banking for users.
As more technologies emerge and newer doors open, more services are being created to cater to people’s every financial need using financial technologies. For instance, you can now get an advance on that inheritance of yours that’s been taking ages to get processed in the courts. In this article you can learn about their conditions and how it works if you want to get an advance on your inheritance with minimal effort and quite an easy digitized process. This financial service, and many others, helps plenty of people who might be in a tight spot and in urgent need of cash, but are unable to access any due to the lengthy process.
The quest to find newer technologies to facilitate and make things better for users is non-stop. For instance, banks now in some countries are operating hybrid clouds and cloud computing to address issues of security, compliance, and data protection. Hybrid clouds also offer reduced costs and a much better operational efficiency, making them truly the future of banking services. You even have artificial intelligence (AI) been implemented in some places, hopefully to an extent that in the future it can help in back office operations, customer service, and much more!
An optimist will find the current advancements being made in financial technology truly remarkable, for they have the potential to create a better and more comfortable user experience for mankind and actually help people in need of such advancements. On the other hand, there are some who might worry about the digitization of something as critical as financial services, and dread the reliance on machines to manage our finances. While both opinions have their pros and cons, one can’t deny the fact that technology is moving at an exceptionally rapid rate, and it’s quite exciting to view what’s next in store.
According to Tony Smith, MD of Business Expert, for the most part, London has bucked this trend by beating even Silicon Valley to becoming the global Fintech hub. The historic financial centre has welcomed thousands of startups via progressive regulation, a forward thinking consumer market for tech products, and a central European location.
With the shadow of Brexit causing mounting uncertainty in the business community, the question of whether London can retain its title as the Fintech capital is becoming a talking point. More than almost any other industry, the ability to scale Fintech companies relies on access to global talent pools and, with post-Brexit employment laws still uncertain, many fear Britain is going to lose one of its greatest financial assets.
While Theresa May struggles to push through her Brexit plan, other countries have been busy rolling out the red carpet with tax incentives and easy access to funding as a means of luring potential Fintech talent while the going is good.
Paris is one example of this. Sharing London’s historical reputation as business centre, Paris already hosts banks and large insurance companies, alongside a workforce rich in engineers and data scientists. Efforts are being made to entice tech talent via smoother regulation and a city-wide focus on AI training courses.
The German capital, Berlin, is another contender. Berlin is actively promoting Fintech relocation with it’s slogan ‘Keep Calm Startups and Move to Berlin.’ With cheap commercial real estate, governmental funding support, and 100 Fintech startups already placed, Berlin is likely to benefit widely from the political situation in the UK.
Tallinn, Estonia, while smaller than the major capitals, already has the third highest concentration of startups in mainland Europe. Tallinn is now benefiting from the efforts of the post Soviet government who recognised that technological education could drive the economy of the future. Estonia now has one of the most tech-savvy workforces in the world.
Despite the Brexit gloom, many pundits are at pains to point out that London is by means on the ropes just yet. In addition to its position as one of the world’s financial centres, a number of universities specialising in artificial intelligence have added to its hub status.
At the recent Amsterdam Money conference, London’s Deputy Mayor for Business, Rajesh Agrawal commented: “London is the greatest city in the world, and it’s no wonder that so many financial tech companies proudly call it home. As a fintech entrepreneur myself, I know that London has the right mix of clear regulation, world-beating talent, and a massive customer base to make it the international fintech capital.”
The SME market is becoming a key target sector for most banks, but these often more agile organisations demand a better digital approach, and according to Kyle Ferguson, CEO of Fraedom, a personal touch is what’s needed.
Thanks to technological advances within retail banking, the way we bank in our personal lives has changed dramatically. No longer do we wait for bank statements to arrive at the end of each month to get an idea of our spending; instead, we are able to do this whenever we want, and often in real-time, via an app on our phone. This evolution of banking in our personal lives has fuelled a change in expectation among SMEs who are demanding the same experiences and offerings within the world of business banking. As a result of this change in expectations, SMEs are demanding a better digital approach as reflected by 57% of SMEs that now want to move to an online/mobile banking business environment.
However, banks are currently struggling to meet the demands of SMEs and deliver the more personalised service and consumer-focused offering the majority desire. Yet, with a combined annual turnover of £2.0 trillion and accounting for 52% of all private sector turnover in the UK in 2018, SMEs are a highly lucrative market that banks can’t afford to ignore. So, where should banks start and how can they begin to attract SMEs?
According to a survey conducted by Fraedom, 95% of commercial clients who bank digitally in their personal lives, expect to do so at work as well. Ultimately, SMEs want the same digital capabilities, such as apps and online platforms, they get as personal customers. Yet, just 43% of SMEs claim to have near real-time control over business spend. Similarly, almost a third of respondents feel they have very little visibility on a day-to-day basis and nearly a quarter confessing to having to regularly spend significant time and money investigating who spent what. Furthermore, over half of UK respondents said that on average they were personally spending more than two hours a week on expense or financial management tasks. The need to regularly go back and interrogate audit trails can be a further drag on a business’ efficiency and productivity.
Just 43% of SMEs claim to have near real-time control over business spend.
In our personal lives, we now have seamless mobile transactions, highly responsive customer service and fast transaction times. Yet, although personal bank statements typically update in real time and can be viewed on a mobile device, reconciliation of work-based expenditures can take days, if not weeks to process. It is therefore unsurprising that SMEs are left frustrated by the lack of innovation offered by banks and are demanding banks provide the same tools, level of service and personalised experience we have become so used to in our personal lives.
Banks’ engagement levels with SME customers have also been revealed by Fraedom to leave a lot to be desired with just 12% of UK SMEs saying they thought that banks their organisation had dealt with over the past year fully understood their needs as a business. It is therefore vital that banks work to understand the needs of SMEs and also learn to speak the same language.
This understanding of SMEs also extends to ways in which they want to interact with banks. For instance, the 2018 FIS Performance Against Customer Expectations (PACE) found that almost half of UK SMEs prefer to contact their bank through digital methods via a tablet or mobile, for example. Banks need to keep this in mind and offer preferred methods of communication if they are to really tap into this lucrative market.
The SME sector is a truly lucrative market for banks, and ignoring their pleas for a more digital, personalised approach would be a mistake.
The SME sector is a truly lucrative market for banks, and ignoring their pleas for a more digital, personalised approach would be a mistake. It is vital that banks begin to innovate to answer this demand with partnering with fintechs often being the most effective way of doing this. Through fintech partnerships, banks will be able to not only implement the right technology but also to get a better understanding of their SME client-base. As a result, banks will be better able to understand the consumerisation of business processes and technologies; the eagerness of SMEs to adopt these to achieve enhanced agility; and the frustration they feel if they sense that banks are effectively not speaking their language.
This tailored service will allow banks to build lasting, more trust-based relationships with SME customers, while SMEs will gain greater business agility, streamlined efficiencies and increased visibility of expenditure.
The customer pain point defined by the limited function of outdated banking monoliths was realised some time ago. And, as we look at the state of the market in 2019, there are many vendors out there all vying to do the same thing: to bring banking to the state of digital usability that other industries such as e-commerce and entertainment reached a long time ago. Below, Finance Monthly hears from Tobias Neale, Head of Delivery at Contis on the three key areas to look at in order to be a successful FinTech in 2019.
Naturally, like any crowded marketplace, brand differentiation is vital in order to stay competitive in FinTech. After all, when there is an approximated £20 billion in annual revenue up for grabs in the UK alone, it makes sense that there are plenty of incumbents as well as new players joining every year, aiming to get a piece of the pie.
So, what truly makes a successful FinTech company stand out right now? Where are the areas that brands can truly get ahead? Also, and perhaps most importantly to consider, does FinTech look set to eclipse traditional banking altogether, or is there a way the two can grow closer?
Building new infrastructure for financial services is not a new venture – the big payment giants have been shaking up the financial solutions market through regular technology investment projects for some time. However, given the recent wave of innovation instrumented by new and emerging rivals, it is increasingly evident that innovation has gone mainstream – beyond the big banks – and that continuous development is integral to keep pace for everyone, whether new or established. These new entrants, who put technology innovation at the forefront of their business, recognise that it is not just a case of creating technologies to contend with the big banking and payment giants, but also creating with them in order to integrate with and support them.
FinTech moves fast, and the pace at which a service provider can be disruptive is that which sets competitors apart. Start-ups have the advantage of being free of legacy systems that often prove a huge inhibitor to modernising quickly enough to keep pace for their long-standing and well-established counterparts. As a result, new entrants will do well to take advantage of this agile upper hand by ‘moving fast and breaking things’ with mobile-focused products. By quickly adapting to fill gaps left by traditional banking providers they can deliver services in record time.
In recent years, customer trust in the banking and payments industry from both the has been put to the test thanks to disruptions and data breaches affecting both businesses and consumers alike . This means that there is ample room for disruptors to capitalise on the need for a reliable and trustworthy provider that offers great services, extensive support and guidance, particularly for prospects that are looking to establish their first increment of banking services into their ecosystem.
What is important to remember is that disruption is not all about overtaking older established rivals – part of what makes a successful FinTech in 2019 is the ability to integrate with these institutions and move digital transformation for the industry and shared customers. Keeping innovation, agility and customer service at the core of a company’s proposition is what will truly define those looking to follow the success of companies like Monzo and Revolut, in 2019 and far, far beyond.
With over twelve years of experience in the industry, he is currently the CEO of Maxpay and Founder of Genome.
How big is the online payments market in Malta and how is it developing?
The online payments market in Malta is almost exclusively export-oriented. With a population of less than half a million people (that’s about 0.1% of the EU) and a landmass that’s about 0.1% of the area of the United Kingdom, the three islands are mostly a platform for international business servicing the European Economic Area. Because Malta is an EU member state with a compliant regulatory framework, as well as a country that is part of the Schengen visa-free economic area, it has over the years become a hub for financial services companies, with payment gateways, card issuers, e-wallets and online foreign exchange traders located here, but serving Europe and the world. With a banking sector consistently ranking amongst the top 10 of the world’s most reliable banking sectors (according to World Economic Forum rankings), the regulatory framework in Malta is very favourable for establishing and growing financial services firms and opening multinational branches.
What are the challenges associated with operating cross-border in this sector? How do you overcome these alongside your clients?
When it comes to cross-border payments, the two key difficulties that are a persistent barrier for businesses of all sizes in every industry are speed and cost, according to a report by the Bank for International Settlements. Payments sent from practically any country to another are often more expensive, slower, and less transparent when compared to domestic payments. The reasons for this are that cross-border payments are more complex, considered to involve more risk and fall under more rules and regulations as opposed to payments made within one country.
Small and large companies experience different problems with cross-border payments, with large corporations that make high-value international wire transfers experiencing problems with the lack of transparency, including transparency of FX rates, and smaller businesses working with smaller payments that face high transaction costs.
This is why at Maxpay we have made a strategic decision to be transparent about transaction rules, payment clearing timelines and fees upfront. The traditional payments infrastructure is complex and we can’t control fees charged by third parties, which is why with new FinTech products like Genome, we rely on regulated but optimised infrastructure partners. Our goal is to minimise the cross-border friction in terms of costs, requirements and processing time, and we are making great progress in this area with features like an instant currency exchange and instant payment transfers.
Tell us about the specific payment solutions that Maxpay offers.
Maxpay’s focus is on online businesses accepting payments worldwide, so our payment service provision solution is geared towards enabling all legal businesses to accept local payment methods from international customers. But this solution isn’t a mass-market plain-vanilla type. The complexity we discussed earlier is partly solved by our payments solutions’ dashboard with extensive reporting on fees and exchange rates. Yet the real key in our niche is for online sellers to maintain healthy merchant accounts - this is why we invested in proactive chargeback monitoring by partnering with Covery, an AI-powered risk management and fraud prevention platform. We’re also constantly growing our risk analysis team who consult our clients on optimising their e-commerce websites to keep payment success rates high and chargeback rates (and costs) low. So while the PSP solutions market is crowded, we like to think that our clients turn to us for our expertise.
We are progressing toward a cross-border world with fewer middlemen and less paperwork, resulting in faster and cheaper access to financial services for more people over a variety of platforms.
How is Maxpay developing new strategies and ways to help your clients?
We take both evolutionary and revolutionary paths to better serve our clients. With the evolutionary one, we use data science to test automation and smart algorithms that help lower costs and raise payment success rates with new tools like smart payment routing (for lowering transaction costs) and automated retry logic (for better success rates). We also realise that traditional banking is in flux, so we’re developing challenger finance ecosystems like Genome for business. So while finance still involves a lot of paperwork and switching between different systems, with Genome, we have unified personal and business finance, as well as made services for online merchants accessible from within a web and a mobile app. In the process, we’re solving the pain points for large and small businesses with more transparency, instant payments, and lower fees when compared to traditional banking.
What do you think the future holds for online payments?
We are now witnessing the very first attempts at improving the overall efficiency of cross-border payments and international finance. These will eventually interconnect local payment infrastructures and then expand into closed finance ecosystems across borders, increasing the role of peer-to-peer payments. While being generally optimistic about overcoming obstacles, the FinTech community still needs to work on addressing legal, technical, and operational risks. In the end, we are progressing toward a cross-border world with fewer middlemen and less paperwork, resulting in faster and cheaper access to financial services for more people over a variety of platforms. There’s definitely room for more efficiency, better user experience, and we very much plan to be a part of that future.
About Maxpay:
More than just a payments service provider, Maxpay is a platform built by online business owners for online business owners to accelerate growth. At Maxpay, global teams provide access to a broad set of merchant tools within the payments processing stack, deliver deeper local payment insights and offer customised risk intelligence solutions that lower chargebacks. The committed network of online payments professionals offers online businesses live support, resources, and tools to scale worldwide.
For more information, please go to maxpay.com
One sector at the forefront of this disruption is FinTech, in which firms enjoy cost bases lower than those of traditional banks and freedom from the restraints of branch networks and legacy IT systems. As such, they can provide faster services and more innovative products, thereby revolutionising systems and processes, says Rosanna Woods, Managing Director of Drooms UK.
Digitisation will be a priority for firms
FinTech trends have disrupted the industry for over a decade now, and I believe this is the year challenger banks will become prime targets for investors. Large FinTech firms – and traditional financial companies – will also be more likely to get involved in the M&A space as digitisation remains a major driver for deal-making.
In terms of funding, 2018 marked the best-performing year for UK FinTech M&A (US$457.8 billion), which shows that investors are still hunting for the next big FinTech investment. And although Brexit has brought a lot of uncertainty, it could also mean that investors have a lot of dry powder.
Prime examples of challenger banks gaining momentum include Monzo’s crowdfunding exercise and Revolut’s increasing user signups to its finance app that facilitates both worldwide currency and cryptocurrency.
In the digital payments space, we have already seen the roll-out of digital payment methods, particularly via mobile, allowing consumers to make payments at a single tap of a card or mobile device. As banks continue to seek technologies to speed up customer service, they will look to FinTech companies to integrate with their own systems and enhance customers’ experiences.
In terms of funding, 2018 marked the best-performing year for UK FinTech M&A (US$457.8 billion).
Core drivers for M&A
In many ways, growth in FinTech innovation and M&A transactions each contribute to their own success. Businesses and investors are both attracted to opportunities that technology could bring in the industry, and its potential to automate services. This leads to several M&A transactions taking place for geographical expansion and technological innovation.
But will Brexit impact or slow down the developments of financial technologies in the sector? In my opinion, only moderately, if at all. In fact, Blackstone’s acquisition of Thomson Reuters (US$17 billion) last year shows that transaction values increased due to businesses continuously embracing innovation in digital banking, payments, and financial data services.
Although Brexit may have some impact on investors’ confidence in the UK, it is possible that they are simply biding their time. It is common for investors to practice caution when investing in foreign markets. But despite the transactional and regulatory uncertainty we currently face in the UK, I suspect that investors will see the growth in the FinTech space as opportunities to invest in emerging technologies.
Technology’s broader influence
Technology is not just the focus for investment, it is also helping the investment process too. In particular, it has paved the way to making the due diligence process for M&A more efficient and secure. The creation and utilisation of virtual data rooms to help solve the problems faced by dealmakers and investors has been embraced by the industry as good investments.
From a technology provider point of view, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and analytics have digitised the screening process of deals and greatly reduced the time undertaken for due diligence, as well as improving workflow. This is also true for many other sectors such as real estate, legal, life sciences, and energy.
As such, it makes sense to predict more investment in technology that will help the digital transformation of businesses, as demonstrated by Siemens’ investment in software companies in 2007, which generated US$4.6 billion in 2016.
Although Brexit may have some impact on investors’ confidence in the UK, it is possible that they are simply biding their time.
The heightened desire of investors to acquire businesses for digital transformation remains – as previously mentioned - one of the core drivers for M&A. Although Brexit may eventually present unexpected challenges to the FinTech sector, it will continue to thrive. This belief is supported by a report by Reed Smith that stated 31% of financial organisations plan to invest over US$500 million in the FinTech sector this year.
Opportunities amid uncertainties
Taking stock of the aftermath left by the EU referendum, Brexit has undoubtedly created lingering uncertainties and ever-present threats to deal making. But the overall value of UK M&A activities between 2017 and 2018 shows that Brexit did not prevent UK M&A from performing. In fact, over 140 M&A transactions in Q1 2018 were FinTech deals.
This was due to many factors, such as the strong relationship between UK and US investors, as well as the pound’s devaluation after the EU referendum, which made cross-border deals more attractive for global investors and particularly those deals involving businesses specialising in RegTech and digital payments.
Although the on-going Brexit negotiations are not going well and that a no-deal Brexit, despite not being ideal, is still a real possibility, recent history suggests that the FinTech M&A sector will not be as heavily affected as it might seem. The signs indicate that investors will continue to pursue new technologies that can help make business operations more efficient.
Going forward
What concerns businesses and investors in the UK is the fear that London may lose its crown as a FinTech hub. They will be looking for a Brexit deal that replicates the passporting rights the City currently enjoys and would also allow the UK economy to grow by about 1.75% by 2023 (as firms continue to trade in the City).
Moving forward, the difficulties Brexit presents are not insurmountable for the FinTech sector. It will continue to grow and disrupt the industry – whether the UK leaves the EU with a deal or not – and although it is wise to make contingency plans, businesses should avoid making drastic decisions. The FinTech sector is here to stay and it is well-equipped to withstand the many challenges ahead.
Industry experts CACI forecast that 2019 could very well see mobiles usurp PCs as the main appliance for internet banking. It’s even predicted that by 2023, 72% of Brits will use apps as their main financial management source.
But mobile banking has already transformed how we spend money. Let’s explore how.
Thanks to banking apps, it’s easier than ever to access money. Access to phone signal granted, you can transfer money, anywhere, at any time. However, with this comes the risk of overspending.
And many people can’t resist the temptation to buy more than they need. In fact, a recent report by Bain & Co. revealed that on average, mobile payment users spend twice as much as those who don’t.
Therefore, what we’re spending money on – as well as how we’re spending it - has already been hugely affected by mobile banking.
Very often, with the risk of overspending comes an increased demand for easy money-saving tactics. Unsurprisingly, banks have been quick to jump on this need by bringing out budgeting apps.
Although increased spending remains common among mobile bankers, these apps could help to provide a remedy. Because managing finances is a priority for most people, they have been quick to take off.
So, mobile banking hasn’t just influenced how we spend — it’s changing how we save, too.
Banking apps make it more straightforward to exchange money and make purchases, therefore they are particularly valuable for people who struggle with traditional methods of money management.
For wheelchair users, visiting a local bank or an ATM can often be inconvenient. But thanks to these apps, financial affairs can be managed from home. The need to venture into town to take out cash or pay for goods is now a thing of the past — and this is transforming lives.
Likewise, this has revolutionised how people with specific learning differences monitor their money. Features like colour-coding are ideal for users with Dyslexia, Dyspraxia and ADHD, for example.
For people who live far from the town or city, driving to an area with a hole in the wall or bank is no longer necessary as banking can be done from home. Using this kind of app could even reduce your carbon emissions.
Mobile banking isn’t just benefitting its users — it’s helping the environment.
How we spend, save and manage our money has been completely transformed by mobile banking. No wonder its set to rise in popularity over the next four years. This is an exciting time for the financial world. How will it affect your finances?