Wall Street Plunges as Fed Plans Fewer Rate Cuts in 2025.
The central bank has reduced the benchmark federal funds rate by 25 basis points, bringing it to a range of 4.25% to 4.5%.
The US Federal Reserve announced a reduction in interest rates on Wednesday, yet indicated that it would implement fewer rate cuts than anticipated in 2025, amidst ongoing concerns regarding its efforts to reduce inflation in the largest economy in the world.
Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, characterized inflation as "stubborn," while affirming that the central bank is confident its rate increases will continue to diminish the rate of price increases.
In response to the announcement, Wall Street experienced a significant decline, with the S&P 500 closing nearly 3% lower, and the tech-oriented Nasdaq composite falling by 3.6%.
In its final rate decision before Donald Trump takes office in January, the central bank reduced the benchmark federal funds rate by a quarter of a percentage point, bringing it to a range of 4.25% to 4.5%.
Although inflation has significantly decreased since reaching a generational high two summers ago, it remains above the Fed's target and has shown an uptick in recent months.
The broader US economy continues to demonstrate strength, with an estimated addition of 227,000 jobs in November. However, the persistent nature of price growth has raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of measures aimed at returning inflation to pre-pandemic levels.
Powell expressed that he continued to hold an optimistic view regarding the US economy. “I think it’s pretty clear we have avoided a recession. I think growth this year has been solid,” Powell told a news conference. “The US economy has been remarkable.”
The growing discontent among Americans regarding the increase in prices in recent years has been identified as a significant contributor to Donald Trump's electoral success, as he consistently promised during his campaign to reduce these costs.
However, the president-elect has acknowledged that fulfilling this promise—met with doubt by numerous economists—will be a considerable challenge.
When questioned by Time magazine about whether his presidency would be deemed unsuccessful if prices do not decrease, Trump responded: “I don’t think so. Look, they got them up. I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will.”
The prospect of Trump's return to the White House presents a challenging scenario for the Federal Reserve. He has consistently voiced his disapproval of the central bank's decisions, and his supporters have suggested the possibility of limiting its autonomy.
Jerome Powell, who has experienced a tumultuous relationship with the incoming president since his initial appointment during Trump's first term, indicated last month that he would not step down if requested to do so by Trump.
The Federal Reserve's decision to reduce interest rates while signaling fewer cuts in 2025 highlights the ongoing struggle to control inflation. Despite some economic growth, inflation remains persistent, leaving the Fed with limited options.
Wall Street’s sharp decline reflects market concerns over the effectiveness of these measures, and the Fed’s cautious approach may only prolong the financial uncertainty. Meanwhile, Donald Trump's rhetoric surrounding inflation and his skepticism of the Fed’s actions create further instability. With the central bank’s independence under threat and inflation continuing to burden Americans, the future of the economy remains uncertain and challenging.
LATEST: Trump Sparks Chaos in Washington by Threatening Bipartisan Budget Deal.
Bernie Madoff: The Man Behind the Infamous Ponzi Scheme.
Bernard Lawrence "Bernie" Madoff was an American financier known for pulling off the biggest Ponzi scheme ever, scamming thousands of investors out of around $65 billion over a span of at least 17 years.
He was also a trailblazer in electronic trading and served as the chairman of the Nasdaq stock exchange in the early '90s.
Madoff passed away in a prison hospital at the age of 82 on April 14, 2021, while serving a 150-year sentence for money laundering, securities fraud, and various other crimes.
Explore The Full Madoff Story In The Book "
Key Points
Bernie Madoff was a financial manager behind one of the biggest scams ever seen.
His Ponzi scheme lasted for years, cheating thousands of investors out of billions.
People believed in Madoff because he seemed credible, offered impressive but not crazy returns, and said he had a solid investment strategy. In 2009, he was handed a 150-year prison sentence.
Early Life and Education
Madoff was born on April 29, 1938, in Brooklyn, New York, to Ralph and Sylvia Madoff. His dad was a plumber before he and his wife jumped into the finance world. They started Gibraltar Securities, but it eventually had to shut down due to SEC pressure.
Bernie got his bachelor's degree in political science from Hofstra University in 1960 and even took a short stint at Brooklyn Law School. While he was in college, he tied the knot with his high school sweetheart, Ruth (née Alpern), and together they launched Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in 1960.
Initially, he dabbled in penny stocks using $5,000 he made from installing sprinklers and lifeguarding.
Significant Achievements
Madoff seemed to have a bit of a grudge and thought he wasn't really included in the Wall Street elite. In a chat with journalist Steve Fishman, Madoff mentioned: "We were a small firm, we weren't a member of the New York Stock Exchange. It was very obvious."
Madoff mentioned that he started to gain recognition as a determined market maker. "I was perfectly happy to take the crumbs," he told Fishman, a client wanted to sell eight bonds, and while a larger firm might look down on such a small order, Madoff's company would happily take care of it.
Success really kicked in when he and his brother Peter started developing electronic trading systems—what Madoff referred to as "artificial intelligence." This innovation drew in a huge volume of orders and helped the business thrive by offering valuable insights into market trends. Madoff shared with Fishman, "I had all these major banks coming down, entertaining me, It was a head trip."
He and four other big players on Wall Street handled about half of the order flow for the New York Stock Exchange—there was some controversy since he covered a lot of the costs—and by the late '80s, Madoff was raking in around $100 million annually.
In 1990, Madoff took the helm as chair of the Nasdaq exchange, and he held that position again in 1991 and 1993.
Drama, Deception, and Lawbreaking
At one point, Madoff lured in investors by boasting about his ability to deliver big, consistent returns using a strategy known as split-strike conversion, which is a real trading method.
However, what he was actually doing was funneling client money into a single bank account to pay off existing clients who wanted to withdraw their funds. He kept this going by bringing in new investors and their money. This is the classic Ponzi scheme setup: continuously bringing in fresh cash while paying out just enough to keep the illusion of huge profits alive.
The whole thing fell apart when the market took a nosedive in late 2008, leading to a rush of clients wanting to pull out their investments.
On December 10, 2008, he admitted to his sons—who were part of his firm—that he had been dishonest. The next day, they reported him to the authorities. Bernie insisted that neither his sons nor his wife had any clue about his fraudulent activities.
The last reports from the fund showed it had $64.8 billion in client assets.
The Players
It's unclear exactly when Madoff's Ponzi scheme kicked off. He claimed in court that it began in the early '90s, but his account manager, Frank DiPascali, who had been with the firm since 1975, insisted that the fraud had been happening "for as long as I remember."
The reasons behind Madoff's actions are even murkier. He told Fishman, "I had more than enough money to support my lifestyle and my family's. I didn't need to do this for that," adding, "I don't know why."
Madoff's legitimate business was already raking in serious cash, and he could have easily gained the respect of Wall Street as a market maker and a pioneer in electronic trading.
Throughout his conversations with Fishman, Madoff hinted that he wasn’t the sole person at fault for the fraud. "I just allowed myself to be talked into something and that's my fault," he admitted, though he didn’t specify who convinced him. "I thought I could extricate myself after a period of time. I thought it would be a very short period of time, but I just couldn't."
He also shifted some blame onto his clients. Many wealthy individuals and fund managers poured huge sums into Madoff's firm, with some "feeder funds" handing over their clients' entire assets for him to manage.
"Everybody was greedy, everybody wanted to go on, and I just went along with it," Madoff told Fishman. He suggested that these investors must have had some doubts about the returns he was claiming. "How can you be making 15 or 18% when everyone else is making less?" Madoff questioned.
LATEST: Top 9 Money-Saving Tricks To Try In 2025.
The Scheme
When clients wanted to cash in on their investments, Madoff used fresh funds from new investors to make those payouts, all while maintaining his allure of incredible returns and carefully manipulating his victims. He crafted an exclusive persona, often rejecting potential clients at first.
This strategy allowed about half of Madoff's investors to withdraw their money with a profit. However, these investors were later required to contribute to a fund aimed at compensating those who lost money in the scheme.
Madoff built a facade of respectability and generosity, winning over investors with his charitable work. Unfortunately, many nonprofits fell victim to his scheme, with around 10% of the total funds he stole coming from these organizations, as reported by the New York State Attorney General's Office.
Investors found Madoff credible for several reasons:
His main public portfolio seemed to focus on safe investments in well-established companies.
He claimed to employ a collar strategy, which is a method to reduce risk by buying a put option to protect the underlying shares.
His returns were impressive (between 10% and 20% annually) and steady, but not overly extravagant. The Wall Street Journal highlighted this in a well-known interview with Madoff back in 1992:
"[Madoff] insists the returns were really nothing special, given that the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index generated an average annual return of 16.3% between November 1982 and November 1992. 'I would be surprised if anybody thought that matching the S&P over 10 years was anything outstanding,' he says."
The Investigation
The SEC had been looking into Madoff and his investment firm on and off since 1992, which left a lot of people feeling frustrated when he was finally charged. Many believed that if the initial investigations had been more thorough, a lot of the damage could have been avoided.
Harry Markopolos, a financial analyst, was one of the first to blow the whistle. In just one afternoon in 1999, he figured out that Madoff was definitely not being truthful. He submitted his first complaint to the SEC in May 2000, but they completely brushed him off.
In a harsh letter to the SEC in 2005, Markopolos expressed his concerns: "Madoff Securities is the world's largest Ponzi Scheme. In this case, there is no SEC reward payment due to the whistle-blower so basically I'm turning this case in because it's the right thing to do."
In 2005, right after Madoff's company was on the verge of collapsing because a bunch of investors wanted their money back, the regulator finally decided to ask him for proof of his trading accounts. Madoff whipped up a six-page document, and while the SEC wrote letters to a couple of the firms he mentioned, they never actually sent them. And that was pretty much the end of it.
"The lie was simply too large to fit into the agency's limited imagination," writes Diana Henriques, author of the book "The Wizard of Lies: Bernie Madoff and the Death of Trust," which documents the episode.
The SEC took a lot of heat in 2008 after Madoff's fraud came to light and they were criticized for not acting quickly enough. Eight employees got some form of disciplinary action, but none actually lost their jobs.
The Punishment
In November 2008, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC announced a year-to-date return of 5.6%, even though the S&P 500 had dropped by 39% during that time. As the sell-off persisted, Madoff found himself unable to keep up with the flood of clients wanting to withdraw their money.
Then, on December 10, Madoff admitted to his sons, Mark and Andy, who were both employed at the firm, about the situation, according to what he later told Fishman. "The afternoon I told them all, they immediately left, they went to a lawyer, the lawyer said, 'You gotta turn your father in,' they went, did that, and then I never saw them again." Bernie Madoff was arrested on Dec. 11, 2008.
Madoff claimed he was the only one involved, even though a number of his associates ended up in prison. Tragically, his older son Mark took his own life two years after the fraud came to light. Meanwhile, Andy Madoff passed away from cancer at the age of 48 in 2014.
The Sentence
Madoff got hit with a 150-year prison sentence and was told to give up $170 billion back in 2009. The U.S. Marshals ended up auctioning off his three houses and four boats.
On February 5, 2020, his lawyers tried to get him released early, arguing that he was battling a terminal kidney disease that would take his life within 18 months.
Madoff, known as prisoner No. 61727-054, stayed at the Butner Federal Correctional Institution in North Carolina until he passed away in the prison hospital on April 14, 2021.
The Aftermath
The documentation of victims' claims reveals just how complicated and massive Madoff's betrayal was. His last account statements, filled with millions of pages of phony trades and questionable accounting, claimed the firm had racked up $47 billion in "profit."
Even though Madoff admitted guilt in 2009 and was sentenced to life behind bars, countless investors lost their entire life savings, with many stories highlighting the deep sense of loss they experienced.
As of December 2023, around $4.22 billion has been returned to about 40,843 of his victims through the U.S. Department of Justice's Madoff Victim Fund.
Depictions of Bernie Madoff in Popular Culture
Bernie Madoff has been painted as a bad guy in the media and pop culture. In a 2009 episode of HBO's Curb Your Enthusiasm, Jason Alexander, known for his role as George on Seinfeld, gets conned by Madoff and ends up losing all his cash. Madoff or similar characters also show up in Woody Allen's movie Blue Jasmine and in Elinor Lipman's book, The View from Penthouse B.
In 2017, Robert De Niro took on the role of Madoff in the HBO film The Wizard of Lies. There have been several documentaries and books that dive into Madoff's scam and his eventual downfall.
Who Was Bernie Madoff?
Bernie Madoff was an American financier who ran the biggest Ponzi scheme ever, raking in around $65 billion without any plans to actually invest it.
He lured investors in with promises of high returns, but instead of putting their money to work, he just stashed it in a bank account to fund his extravagant lifestyle. He kept the scam alive for years by using new investors' money to pay off the old ones.
When the 2008 financial crisis hit, Madoff couldn't keep up with the withdrawal requests anymore. His sons ended up reporting him to the authorities.
Madoff was found guilty of fraud, money laundering, and other charges, leading to a 150-year sentence in federal prison. He passed away in prison on April 14, 2021, at the age of 82.
How Much Money Did Bernie Madoff Pay Back?
The government took control of Madoff's assets, like his properties, yachts, and jewelry, and sold them off to help pay back his victims. By September 2022, around $4 billion had been returned to about 40,000 people affected.
How Was Madoff Exposed?
Even though multiple people tipped off the SEC and other agencies about Madoff's fraudulent activities, he was only caught after confessing to his sons. In 2008, when he couldn't keep up with investors wanting their money back, he came clean to Mark and Andrew, who then reported him to the authorities.
The Takeaway
In 2009, at 71 years old, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 serious charges, including securities fraud and money laundering. His Ponzi scheme became a major example of the greed and dishonesty that many believe was rampant on Wall Street before the financial crisis. Madoff, who inspired countless articles, books, and films, received a 150-year prison sentence and was ordered to forfeit $170 billion in assets, yet no other big names on Wall Street faced any consequences after the crisis.
Madoff passed away in a federal prison in April 2021 at the age of 82.
Bernie Madoff’s actions have left a lasting stain on the financial world. His Ponzi scheme destroyed lives, ruined careers, and undermined trust in investment systems. While he amassed incredible wealth, it came at the expense of countless innocent victims who lost their savings, their homes, and their futures.
Madoff’s betrayal not only harmed individuals but also eroded confidence in the regulatory systems that were supposed to protect them. Ultimately, his legacy serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked greed and the devastating consequences of deceitful financial practices.
Goldman Sachs' Strong Equities Trading Performance: Leading Wall Street with Innovation and Client Focus
Goldman Sachs has continued to solidify its role as a leader in equities trading, proving itself a dominant force on Wall Street through exceptional performance in the third quarter of 2024. The firm’s consistent success in equities trading has been pivotal to the strong earnings reported by Goldman Sachs and other major banks this quarter. This sustained success is attributed to Goldman’s investments in cutting-edge technology, strategic expansions in client services, and a keen adaptability to evolving market trends. By leveraging technology and enhancing client engagement, Goldman Sachs has been able to capture increased market share in equities, drive growth, and maintain its position at the top in an increasingly competitive financial landscape.
The Equities Trading Landscape and Goldman Sachs’ Strategy
Equities trading, a critical revenue stream for investment banks, involves the buying and selling of stocks and other financial instruments. Goldman Sachs has long been one of the top players in this space, but recent years have presented significant challenges to maintaining its leadership position. The rise of advanced trading technologies, heightened client expectations, and volatility across global markets have all demanded more sophisticated and resilient trading platforms. In response, Goldman Sachs has aggressively invested in technology to streamline operations, reduce risks, and enhance its trading capabilities.
One major area of focus for Goldman has been the development and integration of advanced trading algorithms. In the highly competitive equities market, speed and precision are essential, and Goldman’s investment in algorithmic trading has allowed it to optimize trading strategies in real time. By employing machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, the bank can process vast amounts of market data instantly, making more informed trading decisions. This approach has positioned Goldman to react faster to market fluctuations, execute trades with precision, and, as a result, significantly outperform competitors.
Another critical component of Goldman’s strategy has been expanding its equities trading services to better serve a diverse client base. Recognizing that client expectations have evolved, Goldman has tailored its offerings to suit the needs of both institutional clients and individual investors. The firm’s equities trading desk has developed services that cater to varying levels of risk tolerance, asset sizes, and trading preferences, thereby strengthening client relationships and attracting new business. This diversified client approach not only enhances revenue but also stabilizes income streams, as revenues can be spread across a broader range of trading activities.
Investments in Technology: Transforming Equities Trading
Goldman Sachs’ impressive performance in equities trading is largely due to its commitment to technological advancement. The bank has recognized the importance of staying ahead in a fast-evolving market, where technology can be a differentiating factor. From implementing machine learning algorithms to utilizing blockchain for transparency and security, Goldman has positioned itself at the forefront of financial technology.
Machine learning and AI have been especially transformative for Goldman Sachs, enabling the firm to automate complex trading tasks and minimize human error. With the integration of these technologies, Goldman’s trading algorithms can analyze patterns in historical and real-time market data, allowing the firm to anticipate trends and execute trades with precision. This has led to an increase in trading volumes and a higher degree of accuracy in trade execution, both of which have positively impacted Goldman’s bottom line.
Goldman Sachs has also focused on enhancing cybersecurity measures to protect its trading systems and client data. In an era where cyber threats are a constant risk, Goldman’s proactive approach to cybersecurity not only protects its assets but also builds trust with clients. By implementing robust security protocols and using blockchain technology to increase transparency in trading, Goldman has set a new standard for secure equities trading. These investments have paid off as clients increasingly prioritize data security, giving Goldman a competitive edge in attracting and retaining clients.
Additionally, Goldman Sachs has expanded its trading capabilities by incorporating cloud computing. The scalability and computational power of cloud technology allow Goldman to process more data and execute trades faster than ever before. The shift to cloud infrastructure has not only improved the speed of operations but has also enabled Goldman to lower operating costs, ultimately benefiting its profitability. As Goldman continues to develop its cloud-based trading infrastructure, it is likely to see even greater efficiencies, positioning itself for sustained growth in equities trading.
Client-Centric Approach: Meeting the Needs of Diverse Clientele
While technology has been a cornerstone of Goldman’s success, its client-centric approach has been equally instrumental in its strong equities trading performance. Recognizing that client satisfaction is key to long-term growth, Goldman has worked to build lasting relationships and offer customized services to a broad range of clients. The firm has invested in understanding its clients’ needs and tailoring its trading services accordingly.
For institutional clients, Goldman has developed specialized services that cater to the demands of large asset managers, hedge funds, and pension funds. These clients require complex trading strategies, high-frequency trading capabilities, and access to global markets. Goldman’s ability to provide these services efficiently has helped it retain its top-tier institutional clients and attract new ones. The firm’s equities trading desk offers tools for risk management, real-time data analytics, and customizable trading platforms, enabling institutional clients to optimize their trading strategies.
In addition to institutional clients, Goldman has also focused on expanding its services for individual investors. With the rise of retail trading platforms and the increasing interest of individual investors in stock markets, Goldman has recognized the potential of catering to this demographic. The firm has launched platforms that provide educational resources, user-friendly interfaces, and accessible trading options for individual investors. By catering to both institutional and retail clients, Goldman has diversified its client base, reducing dependency on any single revenue stream and enhancing its stability in the equities market.
Expanding into International Markets
In addition to focusing on technology and client services, Goldman Sachs has also made strides in expanding its equities trading operations internationally. Recognizing the potential of emerging markets and the need to diversify beyond the U.S., Goldman has increased its presence in Asia, Europe, and Latin America. This expansion allows Goldman to capitalize on the growth of international markets and hedge against regional economic downturns.
In Asia, for instance, Goldman has strengthened its trading capabilities to accommodate the growing demand for equities in China, Japan, and India. These markets offer unique opportunities, as they are characterized by high trading volumes and rapid economic growth. By establishing partnerships and tailoring its services to the regulatory environments of each region, Goldman has positioned itself as a key player in Asian equities trading.
Similarly, Goldman has expanded in Europe, where it has adapted to regulatory requirements such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). This regulatory framework emphasizes transparency and fair trading practices, aligning with Goldman’s values of ethical trading and client trust. By adhering to these regulations and offering innovative trading solutions, Goldman has successfully grown its European client base and solidified its reputation in international markets.
Financial Performance: Third-Quarter Earnings and Beyond
Goldman Sachs’ strong performance in equities trading has been a significant contributor to its third-quarter earnings, reflecting the effectiveness of its strategies. The firm’s investment in technology, client-centric approach, and international expansion have resulted in impressive financial results, positioning it ahead of competitors in the equities trading space.
In the third quarter of 2024, Goldman reported substantial growth in its equities trading revenue, which played a crucial role in offsetting weaknesses in other areas of the bank’s business. While some sectors, such as investment banking and fixed-income trading, faced challenges due to market volatility and geopolitical uncertainties, equities trading remained resilient. Goldman’s equities desk experienced increased trading volumes, higher margins, and steady demand from clients, all of which contributed to its strong quarterly earnings.
Highlighting the firm’s recent achievements, CEO David Solomon said, "We continue to lean into our strengths – exceptional talent, execution capabilities and risk management expertise – allowing us to effectively serve our clients against a complex backdrop and deliver for shareholders." Solomon’s statement underscores Goldman’s commitment to leveraging its core competencies to achieve success in an increasingly complex and competitive market.
Looking forward, Goldman Sachs is expected to continue benefiting from its investments in technology and client services. As global markets become more interconnected and complex, Goldman’s advanced trading infrastructure and diversified client base position it well for sustained growth. Analysts predict that Goldman’s focus on equities trading will remain a key driver of its earnings, particularly as the firm continues to expand into new markets and invest in cutting-edge technology.
The Competitive Landscape: Outperforming Rivals
Goldman Sachs’ dominance in equities trading has not gone unchallenged. Major competitors like JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America have also made significant investments in technology and client services to capture a larger share of the equities market. However, Goldman’s proactive approach and early investments have given it a competitive edge, allowing it to maintain its leadership position.
Morgan Stanley, for example, has long been a formidable rival in equities trading, known for its extensive client network and innovative trading strategies. However, Goldman’s superior technology infrastructure and focus on cybersecurity have allowed it to attract clients who prioritize data security and real-time analytics. JPMorgan Chase, another top competitor, has also expanded its equities trading capabilities but has focused more on fixed-income trading, where it has a competitive advantage. Goldman’s focus on equities and its ability to adapt quickly to market changes have enabled it to outpace competitors and consistently deliver strong results.
Goldman’s competitors have acknowledged the firm’s success, and many have attempted to replicate its strategies. However, Goldman’s head start in technology investments, coupled with its commitment to client satisfaction, has made it challenging for rivals to match its performance. Goldman’s emphasis on cybersecurity, blockchain technology, and AI-driven analytics has established it as a market leader, setting a benchmark that other banks strive to reach.
Future Prospects: Sustaining Leadership in Equities Trading
As Goldman Sachs looks to the future, it is well-positioned to maintain its leadership in equities trading. The firm’s continued investment in technology, focus on client relationships, and commitment to ethical trading practices are likely to keep it at the forefront of the industry. Goldman’s ability to adapt to changing market conditions and regulatory requirements has been a key factor in its success, and it is expected to continue innovating to meet the demands of a dynamic financial landscape.
One area of potential growth for Goldman is the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into its equities trading strategies. With investors increasingly prioritizing sustainable investments, Goldman has an opportunity to attract clients by offering ESG-focused trading options. By aligning its equities trading strategies with sustainability goals, Goldman can appeal to a broader range of investors and reinforce its reputation as a responsible leader in the financial industry.
Carvana's Incredible Comeback: From Bankruptcy to a 7,000% Surge
Carvana's stock journey has been nothing short of miraculous. After facing near obliteration in 2022, the used-car retailer has skyrocketed by over 7,000%, turning its near bankruptcy into a remarkable success story. For investors who weathered the storm, the rewards have been substantial, highlighting the potential for resilience in the ever-changing market landscape.
A Year of Tumultuous Decline
In December 2022, Carvana was teetering on the brink of collapse, witnessing a staggering 98% decline in its stock price, which plunged its valuation to a mere $400 million. The company, known for its iconic car vending machines, faced a credit crisis stemming from an over-leveraged balance sheet and a deteriorating consumer outlook. The situation worsened as the Federal Reserve's aggressive interest rate hikes left funding options nearly nonexistent.
However, amidst these challenges, Carvana demonstrated remarkable tenacity. Under the leadership of CEO Ernie Garcia, the company successfully negotiated with creditors, including Apollo Global Management, to secure a $1.3 billion reduction on their distressed bonds. Simultaneously, Carvana worked diligently to cut costs and restructure its operations.
A Phenomenal Recovery
Fast forward to today, and Carvana's stock has experienced a phenomenal rebound, now boasting a staggering valuation of $52 billion. The company’s latest earnings report showcases this incredible turnaround, revealing a record adjusted EBITDA of $429 million generated from approximately $3.7 billion in revenue, far surpassing Wall Street's expectations. Additionally, the total number of vehicles sold surged by 34%, reaching an impressive 108,651 units during the third quarter.
These strong results ignited investor enthusiasm, with Carvana’s shares rising around 22% on Thursday, trading at $248.82 as the market approached its close. “Carvana's outstanding performance highlights our status as the fastest-growing and most profitable automotive retailer,” declared CEO Ernie Garcia.
Wall Street's Positive Shift
The turnaround has not gone unnoticed on Wall Street. Following Carvana's impressive earnings report, over ten firms adjusted their price targets upward. Bloomberg data indicates that the average price target for Carvana stands at approximately $200, which is still below the $255 per share at which the stock was trading on Thursday afternoon. This suggests the potential for further upgrades in the near future.
Among the bullish forecasts, JPMorgan has significantly increased its price target to $300 per share, reaffirming its "Overweight" rating. In a note released on Thursday, JPMorgan stated, “Third-quarter 2024 results should be regarded as a pivotal moment that is likely to alleviate any remaining doubts regarding CVNA's recent advancements in unit economics.” The firm emphasized the advantages of Carvana’s operating model and its expanding competitive edge, particularly with its recent entry into the commercial retail marketplace.
Conclusion: A Bright Future Ahead
Carvana’s incredible recovery serves as a testament to the resilience and adaptability of the company in the face of adversity. With its innovative approach and strategic adjustments, Carvana has not only survived but thrived, positioning itself as a formidable player in the automotive retail space. As investor confidence continues to build and Wall Street's support strengthens, the future looks promising for this once-faltering giant. For those who believed in Carvana's potential, the journey has just begun.
The information provided in Finance Monthly is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. All content, including articles, interviews, and analysis, reflects the opinions of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of Finance Monthly.
Investing in financial markets involves risks, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there is no guarantee that any investment strategy will be successful. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Finance Monthly is not responsible for any losses or damages arising from reliance on the information contained herein. By accessing this publication, you acknowledge and accept these terms.
Disclaimer
The information provided in Finance Monthly is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. All content, including articles, interviews, and analysis, reflects the opinions of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of Finance Monthly.
Investing in financial markets involves risks, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and there is no guarantee that any investment strategy will be successful. Readers should conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Finance Monthly is not responsible for any losses or damages arising from reliance on the information contained herein. By accessing this publication, you acknowledge and accept these terms.
Compared to one year ago, the CPI hit 9.1% in June, jumping from the 8.6% year-on-year rise seen the month before. The increase maintains the highest inflation seen in four decades for the US economy.
Wall Street analysts had predicted a month-on-month increase of 1.1% and an annual increase of 8.8%.
June’s rise was heavily influenced by higher fuel and food costs. The price of petrol increased 11.2% from May while energy prices rose 60% over the past year. Food prices were up 1% from May and 10.4% over the previous 12 months.
Last month, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell vowed that policymakers would not allow inflation to overcome the US economy in the long term:“The risk is that because of the multiplicity of shocks you start to transition to a higher inflation regime. Our job is literally to prevent that from happening, and we will prevent that from happening,” Powell said.
“We will not allow a transition from a low-inflation environment into a high-inflation environment.”
[ymal]
But we’re now seeing a divergence among banking behemoths. No longer is Wall Street a united front in corporate American culture. They’re each carving out their own protocols as to when and where work must get done. Citigroup and UBS have taken a hybrid approach, citing the distinct benefits of being together in person while also recognising that working remotely has benefits and creates flexibility for employees. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have pushed for employees to return to the office five days a week, saying that everything else stifles innovation, training and mentoring.
Many of these large financial institutions have invested enormous resources into office space. Goldman’s headquarters at 200 West Street cost $2 billion to build more than a decade ago and this spring, JP Morgan unveiled plans for 2.5 million square feet of office space in midtown Manhattan. It’s hard to imagine they’d leave these spaces largely empty, particularly when they think there are plenty of people who would be willing to come in and work for them. After all, big banks remain highly desirable workplaces, garnering thousands of job applicants per year only to accept, in Goldman’s case, less than 2% of them – making the institution more selective than Harvard.
No longer is Wall Street a united front in corporate American culture.
Of course, the past year has been a grand experiment with different work practices. Wall Street’s banks now have four options:
- Everyone needs to be back in the office full time.
- Everyone needs to be back in the office two or three days a week.
- Everyone can work remotely.
- Everyone can choose where they work best.
From our perspective, we think there’s an important insight that decision-makers are missing. For the first two options, being in the office gives managers the ability (or so they think) to see exactly what their employees are working on when they clock in and out, and who is meeting with whom, raising their sense of certainty. It also gives them a sense of control by dictating when and how work happens. These two actions – raising their sense of certainty and control – may make a manager feel better, but they aren’t accurately calculating how much worse it could make their teams.
According to our research, a majority of employees across a variety of sectors – 54% – don’t want to be back in the office at all and 40% want hybrid options. Only 6% of respondents want to “always or mostly” work in the office. Having to return to the office can threaten people’s sense of status, or their sense of value. They feel untrusted and treated like children. Second, it can affect their sense of autonomy, or our sense of control over a situation, which researchers have found is strongly tied to job satisfaction. Finally, returning to the office also triggers fairness threats, particularly since both the quality of people’s lives and their work performance may diminish when forced back.
The real challenge is that returning to the office isn’t a zero-sum game. A manager feeling more in control turns out to be less of an issue than an employee who feels less in control. The reason? In the brain, a drop in certainty or autonomy turns out to be significantly stronger than an increase in the same experience. Our brains are built to pay far more attention to negative experiences than positive ones, perhaps for good reason: if you miss a reward you may miss lunch, but if you miss a threat you might be lunch. The result is that managers may not notice that they feel slightly better, but their teams feel dramatically worse.
The big question that no one can answer yet, is the true cost of these different options. When you add in the emotional rawness we all still have from the roller coaster of the past two years – the net effects of offering choice in work environments may outweigh the upsides of mandating people be back in their office swivel chairs. If you require everyone back in and use the real estate, what percentage of employees will you actually lose and what does it cost to replace them? Will that cost matter if others want to come in? Similarly, we know that only 3% of Black professionals want to return to the office full-time and that women prefer working remotely compared to men. Will requiring office time then impact your diversity, if the majority of people who are happy to work nine to five in a city office come from similar demographics? Further, what is the net drop in productivity of making people return to the office, given that working from home is about 25% more productive than working in the office?
When viewed from that perspective, it may be best to consider the net effect of all these considerations, compared to the benefits of being together all week. When much of the work can be done virtually, getting together feels special; people are excited to see one another and be productive together. They feel respected and appreciated, instead of being treated like employee No. 749. They’re eager to come to the office for a few days each month for a working session and then grab drinks after. And that, ultimately, may be the best return on an investment you can make right now.
The US central bank increased its policy rate by 75 basis points on Wednesday to a range of 1.5% to 1.75% as officials increased their fight against stubborn inflation.
Wells Fargo & Co now expects a “mild recession” for the end of 2022 and into early 2023.
“The Federal Reserve is going to hike interest rates until policymakers break inflation, but the risk is that they also break the economy,” Ryan Sweet, Moody’s Analytics head of monetary policy research, said. “Growth is slowing and the effect of the tightening in financial market conditions and removal of monetary policy have yet to hit the economy.”
A recession is generally defined as a downturn in overall economic activity that is broad and lasts for more than a few months. The United States has only just emerged from the economic slump that was triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic.
[ymal]
Gensler’s plan would require trading companies to compete directly to execute trades from retail investors, thus increasing competition.
The SEC plans to scrutinise the controversial payment for order flow practice which sees some brokers paid by wholesale market makers for orders.
Gensler said the new rules would push market makers to disclose more data on how much these companies receive in fees as well as the timing of trades in favour of investors.
“I asked staff to take a holistic, cross-market view of how we could update our rules and drive greater efficiencies in our equity markets, particularly for retail investors,” Gensler told an industry audience on Wednesday.
The announcement by the SEC is one of the largest shake-ups of US equity market rules in recent times. It will probably lead to formal proposals in the Autumn, with the public given the opportunity to consider them before a vote by the SEC takes place.
[ymal]
Netflix’s share price initially dropped close to 20% on the news that it had lost 200,000 subscribers globally during the first quarter. Wall Street had predicted the company would gain 2.5 million subscribers over the period. In the current quarter, Netflix believes it will lose 2 million global subscribers.
Netflix has blamed its sudden drop in subscribers on a range of factors, including increased competition, the cost of living crisis which is leaving households with less disposable income, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
In a statement to investors, the streaming giant said: “Streaming is winning over linear, as we predicted, and Netflix titles are very popular globally. However, our relatively high household penetration – when including the large number of households sharing accounts – combined with competition, is creating revenue growth headwinds.”
In 2021, the average payout for New York securities workers was $257,500 as deal-making and trading activity by big banks hit record levels amid surging global stock markets.
New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli called the higher than expected figures “welcome news.”
In 2021, Wall Street contributed approximately 18% of all the taxes collected in New York. This is expected to help New York City trump its projections for income tax revenue.
"We have an April 1 budget deadline for the state, and this is welcome news,” DiNapoli said. “It gives them a little bit more breathing room.”
Several factors are expected to impact Wall Street bonuses this year, including record-high inflation, ongoing post-pandemic recovery, and the economic fallout from Russia’s attack on Ukraine. Presently, New York City and state are estimating that incentive compensation packages for securities industry workers in 2022 will drop by an average of 16%.
The US bank’s latest move makes it the first major Wall Street institution to follow through with a strict Covid-19 vaccine mandate, having announced intentions to do so back in October.
Citigroup’s decision comes as the financial industry struggles with how to return employees to offices safely amid rapidly rising cases of the Omicron variant of the virus. Other major Wall Street banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs & Co, have told unvaccinated staff to work remotely, but have not yet gone as far as firing employees.
So far, over 90% of Citigroup employees have complied with the mandate. While Citigroup is the first Wall Street bank to enforce such a strict vaccine mandate, other major US companies, such as Google and United Airlines, have also introduced “no jab, no job” policies.
Several Wall Street banks and investment firms, including Citigroup, Jefferies Financial Group, and Bank of America, have reversed efforts to get staff back to the office as the Omicron variant of the virus spreads across the Northeast.
Deutsche Bank has encouraged its New York staff to work remotely for the last two weeks of the year and are likely to continue working remotely for several weeks into 2022. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo has also delayed its return-to-office plans. In a statement, the bank said, “Given the changing external environment, we are delaying our return-to-office plans.”
“We are continuing to closely monitor the environment with the health and wellbeing of our employees as our priority,” Wells said. “We look forward to fully returning our teams back to the office.”
New York City is being hit hard by Omicron. Last week, cases rose by around 60%.
Speaking to Reuters, Neal Mills, chief medical officer for the professional services firm Aon said that, while employers are targeting February as a date to make the return, the situation is changing fast. As such, employers “are reluctant to do any communications”, Mills said.
